"""
Fast backend.
This uses float32 precision and no special cases.
This is the original smoothing code. This provides no renormalisation.
"""
import numpy as np
from swiftsimio.accelerated import jit, NUM_THREADS, prange
from swiftsimio.visualisation.projection_backends.kernels import (
kernel_single_precision as kernel,
)
from swiftsimio.visualisation.projection_backends.kernels import kernel_gamma
[docs]
@jit(nopython=True, fastmath=True)
def scatter(
x: np.float64,
y: np.float64,
m: np.float32,
h: np.float32,
res: int,
box_x: np.float64 = 0.0,
box_y: np.float64 = 0.0,
) -> np.ndarray:
"""
Create a weighted scatter plot.
Computes contributions to from particles with positions (`x`,`y`) with smoothing
lengths `h` weighted by quantities `m`. This includes periodic boundary effects.
Parameters
----------
x : np.ndarray[np.float64]
Array of x-positions of the particles. Must be bounded by [0, 1].
y : np.ndarray[np.float64]
Array of y-positions of the particles. Must be bounded by [0, 1].
m : np.ndarray[np.float32]
Array of masses (or otherwise weights) of the particles.
h : np.ndarray[np.float32]
Array of smoothing lengths of the particles.
res : int
The number of pixels along one axis, i.e. this returns a square
of res * res.
box_x : np.float64
Box size in x, in the same rescaled length units as x and y. Used
for periodic wrapping.
box_y : np.float64
Box size in y, in the same rescaled length units as x and y. Used
for periodic wrapping.
Returns
-------
np.ndarray[np.float32, np.float32, np.float32]
Pixel grid of quantity.
See Also
--------
scatter_parallel
Parallel implementation of this function.
Notes
-----
Explicitly defining the types in this function allows for a 25-50% performance
improvement. In our testing, using numpy floats and integers is also an improvement
over using the numba ones.
"""
# Output array for our image
image = np.zeros((res, res), dtype=np.float32)
maximal_array_index = np.int32(res) - 1
# Change that integer to a float, we know that our x, y are bounded
# by [0, 1].
float_res = np.float32(res)
pixel_width = 1.0 / float_res
# We need this for combining with the x_pos and y_pos variables.
float_res_64 = np.float64(res)
# Pre-calculate this constant for use with the above
inverse_cell_area = res * res
if box_x == 0.0:
xshift_min = 0
xshift_max = 1
else:
xshift_min = -1 # x_min is always at x=0
xshift_max = int(np.ceil(1 / box_x) + 1) # tile the box to cover [0, 1]
if box_y == 0.0:
yshift_min = 0
yshift_max = 1
else:
yshift_min = -1 # y_min is always at y=0
yshift_max = int(np.ceil(1 / box_y) + 1) # tile the box to cover [0, 1]
for x_pos_original, y_pos_original, mass, hsml in zip(x, y, m, h):
# loop over periodic copies of this particle
for xshift in range(xshift_min, xshift_max):
for yshift in range(yshift_min, yshift_max):
x_pos = x_pos_original + xshift * box_x
y_pos = y_pos_original + yshift * box_y
# Calculate the cell that this particle; use the 64 bit version of the
# resolution as this is the same type as the positions
particle_cell_x = np.int32(np.floor(float_res_64 * x_pos))
particle_cell_y = np.int32(np.floor(float_res_64 * y_pos))
# SWIFT stores hsml as the FWHM.
kernel_width = kernel_gamma * hsml
# The number of cells that this kernel spans
cells_spanned = np.int32(1.0 + kernel_width * float_res)
if (
particle_cell_x + cells_spanned < 0
or particle_cell_x - cells_spanned > maximal_array_index
or particle_cell_y + cells_spanned < 0
or particle_cell_y - cells_spanned > maximal_array_index
):
# Can happily skip this particle
continue
if cells_spanned <= 1:
# Easygame, gg
if (
particle_cell_x >= 0
and particle_cell_x <= maximal_array_index
and particle_cell_y >= 0
and particle_cell_y <= maximal_array_index
):
image[particle_cell_x, particle_cell_y] += (
mass * inverse_cell_area
)
else:
# Now we loop over the square of cells that the kernel lives in
for cell_x in range(
# Ensure that the lowest x value is 0, otherwise we'll segfault
max(0, particle_cell_x - cells_spanned),
# Ensure that the highest x value lies within the array bounds,
# otherwise we'll segfault (oops).
min(
particle_cell_x + cells_spanned + 1, maximal_array_index + 1
),
):
# The distance in x to our new favourite cell -- remember that our
# x, y are all in a box of [0, 1]; calculate the distance to the
# cell centre
distance_x = (
np.float32(cell_x) + 0.5
) * pixel_width - np.float32(x_pos)
distance_x_2 = distance_x * distance_x
for cell_y in range(
max(0, particle_cell_y - cells_spanned),
min(
particle_cell_y + cells_spanned + 1,
maximal_array_index + 1,
),
):
distance_y = (
np.float32(cell_y) + 0.5
) * pixel_width - np.float32(y_pos)
distance_y_2 = distance_y * distance_y
r = np.sqrt(distance_x_2 + distance_y_2)
kernel_eval = kernel(r, kernel_width)
image[cell_x, cell_y] += mass * kernel_eval
return image
[docs]
@jit(nopython=True, fastmath=True, parallel=True)
def scatter_parallel(
x: np.float64,
y: np.float64,
m: np.float32,
h: np.float32,
res: int,
box_x: np.float64 = 0.0,
box_y: np.float64 = 0.0,
) -> np.ndarray:
"""
Parallel implementation of scatter.
Creates a weighted scatter plot. Computes contributions from
particles with positions (`x`,`y`) with smoothing lengths `h`
weighted by quantities `m`.
This includes periodic boundary effects.
Parameters
----------
x : np.ndarray[np.float64]
Array of x-positions of the particles. Must be bounded by [0, 1].
y : np.ndarray[np.float64]
Array of y-positions of the particles. Must be bounded by [0, 1].
m : np.ndarray[np.float32]
Array of masses (or otherwise weights) of the particles.
h : np.ndarray[np.float32]
Array of smoothing lengths of the particles.
res : int
The number of pixels along one axis, i.e. this returns a square
of res * res.
box_x : np.float64
Box size in x, in the same rescaled length units as x and y. Used
for periodic wrapping.
box_y : np.float64
Box size in y, in the same rescaled length units as x and y. Used
for periodic wrapping.
Returns
-------
np.ndarray[np.float32, np.float32, np.float32]
Pixel grid of quantity.
See Also
--------
scatter
Creates 2D scatter plot from SWIFT data.
Notes
-----
Explicitly defining the types in this function allows for a 25-50% performance
improvement. In our testing, using numpy floats and integers is also an improvement
over using the numba ones.
"""
number_of_particles = x.size
core_particles = number_of_particles // NUM_THREADS
output = np.zeros((res, res), dtype=np.float32)
for thread in prange(NUM_THREADS):
# Left edge is easy, just start at 0 and go to 'final'
left_edge = thread * core_particles
# Right edge is harder in case of left over particles...
right_edge = thread + 1
if right_edge == NUM_THREADS:
right_edge = number_of_particles
else:
right_edge *= core_particles
output += scatter(
x=x[left_edge:right_edge],
y=y[left_edge:right_edge],
m=m[left_edge:right_edge],
h=h[left_edge:right_edge],
res=res,
box_x=box_x,
box_y=box_y,
)
return output